Sunday, July 26, 2009

A warning to Richdale/Slosburg employees

Fraud: something intended to deceive; deliberate trickery intended to gain an advantage. (more details)

Fraud is a felony and both a criminally and civilly prosecutable offense.

You are very aware of the tactics that Richdale/Slosburg has trained and encouraged you use to deceive: giving past tenants the runaround, using false office hierarchies, making up charges on move out, charging multiple tenants for the same charge without repairing it, pretending that tenants have to sign documents waiving their rights to get their money back while pretending to be helpful and concerned, etc... done to gain an advantage for you and the company.

You are personally liable for your actions whether you realized they were illegal at the time or not and can have felony charges brought against you personally for your participation.

You work for a corrupt company. They are putting you at risk for felony charges of fraud being brought against you, and civil suits from those you have wronged. No job is worth that.

If your supervisor is denying that what you were trained to do is fraud, hire your own attorney to get proper legal advice by someone who isn't involved in the system that is in question.

Even Richdale employees are complaining about how this company is run. Check out what ex-employees are saying...

Pros
Quick promotions from within, they don't have a choice no one stays longer than a year!

Cons
Such a high turn around rate. You never feel like you are working at a stable property. No one will teach you anything. Corporate will make your life a living nightmare they mess so much stuff up.

Richdale is constantly hiring because they're constantly losing their employees.

Monday, July 20, 2009

10 Steps to avoid being scammed by Richdale

Richdale charges its tenants bogus damage move out fees and does not actually repair/replace for what they charge you for, this constitutes fraud. Fraud is a felony. Listed below are ways to prevent these illegal actions from being used against you!

Obviously the easiest way to avoid being scammed by them is to not live at any of their properties. By moving there, you are helping to support a company that routinely, without conscience, defrauds it's former tenants out of hundreds of thousands of dollars every year (collectively). Together, we can force them to change their business practices by showing them that we won't accept it (and not only won't pay them their bogus fees, but won't move in to begin with) and tell everyone about it when they try, and gather evidence to turn over to the authorities.

How to protect yourself:
1) When moving in (if you have absolutely no alternative places to go), mark everything down on the move in sheet. Don't fall for the employee's carefree attitude about the small things. Mark them down, have them repaired -- I don't care how minor the issues are, they will charge YOU on move out if you don't have it written down and FIXED. Miniblinds bent? Replace them! Scars on the walls? Have them filled! Any and every stain on the carpet should be marked down. (You must realize that the majority of the time they already charged the last person for these damages so you aren't costing them anything, and you not forcing them to repair the issues gives them the opportunity to charge you when you move out.) Take your own pictures (or video) and have them printed out with dates (from a source that can't be faked)! I had issues where things had been marked but since I didn't consider it bad enough, did not request it be fixed. But even though it was on my move-in sheet, they still charged me on move out. MARK IT, HAVE THEM FIX IT! If you don't, you will be charged for things that were already wrong with the unit. If you didn't do this and are currently a resident, you can maybe relax, there are still ways to prove you didn't do the damage, like request/subpoena the move-out charges for the last renter to show they already charged someone for the damages and/or demand the related invoices to the charges to show no work was ever actually done (by the lack of any invoice. If they don't have an invoice for work that would be contracted, it was never done.). Be creative, write a letter to the new resident (you know their address) and verify that what you were charged for was actually brand new when they moved in. The best practice is to always get them to sign the move-in sheet, let them have a *copy* and you keep the original.

2) Request (and keep) receipts for everything. From my own experience and reports I keep hearing from others, Breckenridge/Richdale's ability to keep track of their money is not always reliable, and when there is an error they always blame the tenant saying you'd not paid for something that you actually had. Some even bring in the canceled check and Richdale does not accept that they made an error and continue to act as though they are owed more. GET RECEIPTS!

3) Keep any work-orders for anything done. Most likely you won't need them, but occasionally you will. My sprinkler in my office started to leak. The Breckenridge workers came and checked it out and filled out a work order for the sprinkler company to repair it. The company came, cut a hole in the wall, Breckenridge was supposed to have their workers repair the drywall but never did. It was so close to move out that I didn't report it, figuring they'd fix it after I was gone and see the work order. However, I was charged for the dry wall damage! Why would I cut a hole out around the sprinkler?? It was a great thing I still have that work order! The charge was deducted, but because I fought back and had the work orders, I was able to (after the BBB got involved) able to get Richdale to reverse these charges. KEEP WORK ORDERS!

4) On move-out, request invoices/receipts for anything and everything you are being charged for. If there is a $165 charge for the air ducts being cleaned and they are unable to produce the invoice, assume they never did it (seriously!). Make them prove it! It is one of your rights as a tenant and one of their responsibilities as a landlord. If they are charging you without proof that they actually incurred a charge, this is illegal -- do not let them take that money. Richdale is intent to take money that does not rightfully belong to them. They will try to get away with whatever you let them. Assume everything they say is a lie until they show you the proper invoices to prove otherwise. Charging you for something that was never actually done and all of their lies and runaround to keep that money constitutes Fraud, which is both criminally and civilly prosecutable for both Richdale and the individual employees involved. Fraud is a felony charge and those convicted face incarceration, punitive fines, restitution, probation, community service, and other penalties. This is very serious crime and one of the most powerful charges against them!!! REQUEST INVOICES!

5) If you are really on top of things, record every phone call. Remember that Nebraska is a "one party state" meaning that only one of you has to know it's being recorded -- and that is you. So record it, and do not tell them. I guarantee you that with their track record of lies and denials of things they tell you on calls, that the voice recordings will come in very handy! They stopped emailing me once I started posting their emails, but they didn't realize that calls can be recorded without notice? RECORD PHONE CALLS!

6) Do not endorse a check if it is not full payment of what you are owed. On the endorsement line, their stamp states that you are accepting the check as payment "in full". A check is a legal contract signed by two parties and if you sign something that says it's in full, but it's not... that document can be strong in court. They know this, and even if a worker tells you to go ahead and cash it and that it's just a standard stamp, DO NOT! Yes it is a standard stamp that is designed to prevent you from getting your money back. In law, this stamp accomplishes "Accord and Satisfaction". By signing it, you are releasing them from repaying the full amount and only have a limited time window to reverse it once you realize what you did. If you do not do it within the specified time window, you have to then additionally prove "Affirmative Defense" which shifts the power to their side, and they know it! They tried to tell me to go ahead and just sign it and not worry about it (as you can see in the email history with an employee). As soon as I declined to endorse the first (incomplete) check, telling them I preferred to have the full payment before I signed that statement, they said that waiting was no problem but then ignored every email after that until I got the BBB involved! DO NOT ENDORSE A CHECK OF THEIRS THAT IS NOT FULL PAYMENT.

7) Don't be afraid of them. They will treat you as though they have the upper hand and for people who are not familiar with tenants' rights, you will probably believe them and give in to lesser payments and sometimes tenants even fork out additional money for completely bogus charges (due to fear/threat of being sued by Richdale), because tenants don't know how to properly fight back and don't realize how the laws the protect the renters. Remember that by law they are required to return the money unless they can show that they incurred damages. They will treat you as though giving back your deposit is optional or that they are being nice to give you back the tiny fraction that they are. It is your money unless they can show legitimate damages! They lied to me so many times with all of my dealings, making stuff up left and right to try to convince me they were justified. Force those scheming liars to prove every bullshit deduction like the law requires! Don't be desperate to get back $100 if you are owed $400 and DEFINITELY do not pay them money that they are not owed. They prey on people who don't know their rights and those who are intimidated by them. For instance, if you contest a charge (which you have every right to do), they may tell you that it will "go to committee" to decide. Then they come back and tell you that the "committee" has decided to reject the claim. Realize, that this "committee" (if they even talk to anyone else) is just their other sleaze ball, lying coworkers! It's a tactic intended to make it feel like there's no where left to go so that you give in to bogus deductions. They prey on people who trust their carefree attitude (During initial walk-through: "Oh don't worry about that damage, that's normal wear and tear, you won't be charged for that on move out..." or when asked to prove that they incurred expenses they are charging for: "Oh yeah, we'll get you those invoices..."). As soon as I demonstrated that I knew that what they were doing was illegal, they changed their story and gave me back nearly every penny I asked for (~4x their initial refund). If the charges are bullshit, I can definitely help you get the full amount back, call me! DO NOT FEAR THEM!

8) Contact the BBB! I discovered much too late in the process that Richdale takes BBB claims much more seriously than just a tenant emailing/calling. Make sure you have already asked for invoices demonstrating they actually incurred charges, etc before filing with the BBB so that the absence of the invoices can be part of your claim (that they could never actually produce the invoices, this is a strong statement because you're exposing their illegal activity). Once the BBB got involved, Richdale suddenly started talking to me again after months of ignoring emails and voice mails. I learned this lesson many months too late! It's free and very simple, they completely take it over, log everything, & send you copies of all correspondence and ignored calls by Richdale, I love the BBB!!! -- I cannot stress the importance of this enough! CONTACT THE BBB!!!!! (It will ask for a company name search, they're listed under "Slosburg Company" just search on that and confirm the address of "10040 Regency Cir # 200 Omaha, NE 68114". There is also a "Richdale Group" listing in IA, but only use that for their IA properties. Slosburg/Richdale are two names for the same beast)

9) If you really want to exercise your rights, refuse to sign their standard settlement agreement (that they send out if you are getting back more money than their initial check) that states you cannot discuss the terms of the settlement. Remember, they owe you the money -- PERIOD. You do not have to exchange your silence for something you are already owed! This may make some feel uncomfortable since Richdale will tell you they'll send you a check only after you sign the agreement. Be firm! They had wanted me to sign (and take down my blog and my review) but I refused. They are stealing from you, you do not owe them your silence, so do not give it away. That would be like if a mugger stole your wallet, you hounded him for a year and a half and he says "ok, jeez! I'll give it back, but you have to sign this legally binding agreement that you won't tell anyone how I stole from you and if you do, you have to give your money back to me." That's complete BULLSHIT!!! Other potential tenants have a right to know what is going on with Richdale! Richdale will act like signing the agreement is your only way of getting your money, that is a LIE -- know your rights, signing the document is giving away your rights! DO NOT SIGN ANY AGREEMENT THAT REQUIRES YOUR SILENCE!

10) Post a review. Take advantage of the fact that you haven't signed away your silence. Apartment review sites are becoming more and more popular and important to renters. Of course, Richdale knows this and former employees have admitted to creating false reviews and they are asking residents on move out to write a positive review due to their horrible ratings. This is backfiring since Richdale hasn't stopped scamming people so it just encourages reviews like this one. Be detailed in your review. I've seen some reviews that just say "these people will rob you!" And while that's true, you need to include as many details as possible so that the readers can understand what they are guilty of. Obviously, you don't need to go into as much detail as I have in this blog, but specifics help people make up their own mind. Knowing your rights will help you along the process so that you know what to ask Richdale and can show the runaround/lies they gave you, to more clearly demonstrate the illegality of their actions. If you see comments that blame the renter on review sites (one commenter told me that I "must have done something to provoke them"), understand that these are Richdale employees. They also post obviously fake positive reviews (employees posting reviews is a Terms of Service violation of that site). The fact that they are actively telling people to go post a positive review to counter the negative ones and even bother to tell people that I'm insane and a liar shows how important they know these sites are. The fact that they first told me they'd only give me money if I took down the blog and removed my review also shows how much they don't like having their illegal activity revealed. My response was "mmmmm, yeah... I don't think so." POST A REVIEW!

When talking with a supervisor at Richdale (after the BBB got involved and suddenly Richdale responded to me) I commented to her that I hadn't been too concerned about some of the minor damage on move-in, because "if it passed inspection for the last tenant, then I'd be ok too." She scoffed and while laughing said "You don't know what we charged the last tenant!" I responded, chuckling, "Well, if you charged them, then you would have repaired it, right?" She was caught in her self-made trap and had no answer. This was clear confirmation that they see no correlation between charging a tenant and actually doing the work they deducted from your deposit, something I'd only casually suspected to that point (fraud).

Realizing that what they're doing is illegal makes it much easier to not back down; know you've got the law clearly behind you. Fight any unjustified charge (well, not the rekey charge and cable disconnect -- those are charges you agreed to when you moved in), demand to see either the invoices/receipts relating to the deductions or demand to get the money back. It's not only Richdale that is guilty of fraud, but the individual employees who participate are also on the list for prosecution in the future. Remember, they get bonuses based on how much they screw their tenants and they have a bunch of tricks they use to accomplish that. After reading this blog, now you'll know how to recognize and defend yourself against their tricks.

If you are currently a Richdale employee, QUIT IMMEDIATELY snagging copies of as many incriminating documents before you go. Please call me first! I'll tell you exactly what types of documents can best show their guilt, and you probably know about crimes I'm currently unaware of. Contact me through the VM widget on the side so that you can help the prosecution and not have any charges filed against you personally. No job is worth having felony charges brought against you. I know that you probably signed agreements at the start of your employment stating you will never talk about what you did there, but look into whistleblower status which allows you to break those agreements when exposing illegal activity. You'll be ok, but get out now... and contact me, otherwise you are part of the problem and will be prosecuted as such. Management will tell you to ignore all of this, dismissing it, laughing it off, telling you that it's all fake and lies. Or they will tell you that what you're doing is not illegal. For your own protection, I suggest hiring your own attorney to get legal advice if you do not believe that what you're doing is illegal or that you risk criminal prosecution, you can be charged with a criminal offense for the illegal activity you were trained to do (whether you realized it was illegal or not). You are also exposed to civil law suits as well. Past employment records can be subpoenaed and employees that participated in these activities & did not report them can definitely be prosecuted. Quitting now is not protection enough from criminal charges, you must join forces with the prosecution to protect yourself.

A watched pot never boils. Because of the truths that are surfacing, Richdale employees are realizing that what they are doing is fraud. While they already knew they were trained to lie, they may not have realized that lying for gain is the definition of fraud and that they can be individually prosecuted both criminally and civilly, "They told me to do it" is not a legitimate excuse. By this blog training Richdale employees that they were coerced to do illegal activities without their knowledge of the illegality, that it will cause them to think twice before they do it again. Also, by exposing their practices to the tenants and providing guidance through the move-out process through the Hotline above, it shines a spotlight on Richdale. Defrauding any more tenants while being watched so closely would be far too risky. So, I really hope that your move-out experience is very different from what was happening to prior tenants. They'd have to be really ballsy (or just plain stupid) to do anything right now. We're watching you!

If you have proof of charges for move-out expenses that were never done (demand invoices!) or any other tidbits of experience with Richdale that confirms/supplements anything I've stated here, please contact me.

In addition to the blatant fraud mentioned throughout this site, here's some legal rules about security deposits that I know that Richdale is guilty of violating (either from my experience or that of others), taken from "Landlord Legal Mistakes":

7. Using Security Deposits for the Wrong Projects

The most frequent types of cases heard in small claims court are arguments over security deposit retentions. Yet the basic rule -- that deposits should be used only to cover damage beyond wear and tear, needed cleaning, and unpaid rent -- isn't hard to understand. Still, landlords routinely use the deposit to cover appliance upgrades, cosmetic improvements and other refurbishing, not repairs. Not surprisingly, many of these landlords lose these cases in small claims court.

9. Keeping Security Deposits When Tenants Break a Lease

When tenants break a lease and leave early, landlords often keep the entire deposit, reasoning that the tenant's bad behavior justifies doing so, and that they'll ultimately need it anyway to cover rent. In many states, this is illegal -- you must take reasonably prompt steps to re-rent, and credit any new rent toward the tenant's obligation for the rest of the lease. Keeping a two months' rent deposit and re-renting within a month is not legal.

10. Failing to Return Security Deposits According to Law

This list wouldn't be complete without another reference to security deposits. Not only are they used improperly, they're often not returned according to state law, either. Many states have deadlines by which landlords must itemize their use of the deposit and return any balance. It's not uncommon for tenants to wait many weeks or months for this accounting. In some states, the deliberate or "bad faith" retention of the deposit will result in harsh penalties against the landlord, such as an order that the landlord pay two or three times the deposit to the tenant.


They tell their employees that the tenants cause a lot of damage and they have to recover the expenses in some way. If the damage is legitimate, then of course the tenant should pay. But Richdale's practice is to use bogus charges, or they charge for actual minor damage (which was actually there prior to move in) but then do not repair it to see if the next tenant won't mark it down on their move in... then charge them for it again on move out. It's clever because if you challenge it when you move out, they can show you the minor "wear and tear" damage (landlords are supposed to absorb that cost) so tenants who don't know the law just roll over and take it. 1) By law, normal "wear and tear" damage is not to be paid by the tenant 2) By subpoenaing past tenant move-out charges you can prove that while they charged the previous tenant, they never did the repair, and charged you for the same damage which constitutes fraud... which is much more significant. So they're not just charging one person for "wear and tear" damage which was already illegal, they keep charging for the same damage over and over and over until someone marks it on their move-in sheet and demands it be repaired prior to move in. Most times that damage is so minor, tenants don't put it down. Richdale is full of liars, cheats, swindlers, thieves and crooks... most of the time, you should believe the opposite of what they tell you. Seek legal counsel, google your way to knowledge, or contact me for help out of the mess you didn't know you accidentally stepped into.

Always remember that you have rights too, and many of Richdale's tactics are simply not legal! FIGHT BACK. You will get your money back if you know your rights and refuse to back down! Hopefully with all the pressure on them right now, you won't have to. Good luck!

I'm the one the employees warned you about

So, once I'd gone through the BBB complaint filing process (very easy and free, they're listed under "Slosburg Company") and let Richdale understand that I knew that what they were doing was illegal --suddenly, they gave me nearly every penny I'd asked for in my final demand letter. I had asked for specific invoices and they kept telling me "oh sure, we'll get those to you" but since I knew they didn't exist (the lack of invoices proving fraudulent deductions), I wasn't surprised when I got the call where they said "We can get you the invoices, but let's go ahead and resolve this without all of that." They knew they didn't have them and I knew they didn't have them so I asked for everything back, a bold move. It worked.

In a very dumb move on their part, they were short by just a few dollars. I'd written up an agreement that said "if you decide to become honest and pay me the $x you owe then I will remove my blog and replace it with a statement saying we'd reached an agreement" Since they fell short by only a few dollars (in Richdale's final attempt to screw me) it actually released me from any moral obligation to the agreement we had (I'm a software developer so "If X then Y" they chose to not do X, clearing me from doing Y, very basic). I got nearly my entire deposit back (~$479), rather than the ~$140 they initially offered me. And since they didn't hold up their end of the agreement, I have no qualms about continuing with my blog and seeking to spread the warnings of what they are doing. I want to help current residents get their money back on move out and prevent prospective tenants from considering moving there. Together we can bring their illegal practices into the open.

On move out, they actually tell people that I am crazy and a liar and to please write up a positive review to counter all the negative ones. But as you can see by this review, since they continue to screw people, all it does is make people more likely to post how bad their experience was. The workers who tell you that I'm lying probably believe it themselves, because they were not involved in all the calls and emails and have been told by management a series of lies and they spread those lies, believing they are true. I think most Breckenridge employees are naively unaware of what Richdale does to the former residents after they move out. I really didn't have problems with Breckenridge, it was the property management company that owns them that is full of crooks and liars, who will all (unless they've jumped ship and joined the prosecution) eventually see their day in court being prosecuted for the fraud they are involved with.

But, fortunately, the internet is a powerful tool to make people aware of companies that you should steer clear of. Richdale's practices have worked for so many years they don't know how to adjust to all the easily accessible truths surfacing about them preventing people from moving in, and they are hurting from the many previous tenants' terrible reviews. All they have to do is stop screwing people with bogus move-out deposit deductions and they'd increase their rating, simple! They know how valuable apartment review sites have become recently, which is why they not only encourage people to post positive reviews, but as you read in the linked review above, former employees have admitted that they routinely post bogus positive reviews in an attempt to deceive potential renters. So their very low rating is even AFTER having stuffed the ballot box! DO NOT RENT FROM ANY RICHDALE PROPERTY. If you are already there, please call me and I will give you advice on your situation to help you not get screwed by them. Knowing is half the battle!

Saturday, May 30, 2009

The email that worked.

This is the email to the manager that ended up working. G- only contacted me once I'd filed with the BBB, prior to that they refused to talk to me because they didn't like dealing with someone who knew their tricks and the law. They lost their normal options to screw people and resorted to trying to wear me out. I did not give in.

===================================================

G-,

I appreciate you working with me to handle this matter.

The amount I calculated is $479.30 for the new check (I will destroy the old one, it has already expired many months ago anyway).

I've attached a spreadsheet with the breakdown. I left the $50 VIP credit in, since had the other erroneous charges not been there, I still would have been awarded that (as long as it didn't exceed the original deposit, of course) and just a show of good will on Richdale's part for how long they've dragged their feet.

Sorry I got a little curt on the phone, but it was a little shocking to hear you state that I had no ability to deduce that the previous tenant was not charged for damage to mini-blinds on move-out, since if they had been charged then the damaged items would have been replaced, right? Unless it is Richdale's regular practice to charge people for replacement, but not replace the damaged blinds so that they can charge the next tenant for the same damage. Is that what happened with the air ducts and why after many months no invoice could be produced that it was actually done? It'd be interesting to subpoena the previous tenant's move-out charges and see how many were duplicated on mine.

As for the comment about having to replace all the padding throughout the apartment, J- had already stated that it was only one small piece that was replaced but didn't know where other than it was in the front room (caused by the sprinkler solution), so I know your claim of pad replacement for the whole apartment is not true, and I don't particularly appreciate statements being made as fact when I've already been told something else by another employee, it forces me to question everything that is said. Also, the "excessive cat hair" as first described to me went along with the pictures from the front room, not from the air ducts. Again, had the employee waited until after the maid had come, that cat hair would not have been present. My thinking was "I'm paying $100 for the maid service, why would I vacuum first?"

If this works for you, I will remove my negative posts on my blog and add a new post indicating an agreement was met (with no specific $ amounts given). I feel that the level of treatment has been so poor that it's now approaching a year after moving out where legitimate issues have been ignored by the staff, requiring me to file with the BBB before I can talk to anyone that's serious about resolution, I'm at least owed the ability to say that much... that new blog post would be my final posting about the issue and I would stop my video interviews of previous tenants and I would consider the matter closed.

Based on my experience and that of other previous tenants (as well as direct statements made by J- that they automatically assume any damage was caused by the tenant), it would seem that Richdale's practice is to charge the resident without doing any research hoping they'll just accept the payment, ignore the resident if they pursue it until it escalates to the BBB, then attempt to gain their silence while only offering what they were already owed. Richdale wouldn't have to coerce people's silence and would also have much higher ratings on apartment rating sites if they just dealt with their tenants fairly from the start. The vast majority of the complaints published on the web by others are about how they were treated after they left.

It's taken a year of frustration to get Richdale's attention to get them to do what should have been done from the beginning, and in addition to all of the headaches, now I'm also being asked to also give up my ability to talk about it to let others know what problems they may encounter without being offered anything in return that wasn't already owed to me. The courts would allow me to get both the money and my freedom to warn others.

Imagine someone comes along and takes your wallet. After a year of hassles and being ignored, they finally tell you "OK OK, I'll give it back to you... but only if you don't tell anyone I took it." That's how Richdale sounds to me right now. That's a pretty shady business practice... it really either needs to stop or be exposed so others know to steer clear.

So to recap: You send a check for $479.30, I remove the negative posts from the blog (and revise my blog description that shows at the top of each page), I add a new post indicating we've agreed upon a settlement that we're both happy with and the matter would be closed. Sound good?

Thanks,
Paul

========
The check they sent was shy of my demand by a few dollars, thus releasing me from any moral obligation to hold up my end of the bargain. If X then Y. They chose to not do X, I therefore do not do Y. Very simple. I also stated that their practices needed to stop or be brought to light. Since they are continuing to deceive more renters after all this (honestly though, I expected that) then it must surface. I gave them their outs, they chose to not take them.

Wednesday, January 7, 2009

Apartment Review Site

Here's my review on apartmentratings.com.

Emails with K- T- (Richdale Group)

Below are emails that I received from Richdale. I had already been having 4 months of issues with them when I finally got switched over to another agent there, who at first sounds like she plans to be helpful, then shows how she was intending to manipulate me into signing a contract that would remove their need to pay me the rest of the money they owe me, when I tell her I'd prefer to not sign that contract, she then ignores every email I send.

I received notice that my issue was transferred to another agent, I responded the same day.

=================================================================================
Paul to K- 6/11/08

Thanks for taking over my issue. I'd been having a very difficult time with J-, refusals to answer questions that I've been asking for 3 months now, he'd ignore my emails until I'd follow up a week later asking again for the information and then only getting partial responses. It has caused quite a bit of frustration, so I'm very glad to be dealing with someone else. :)

As for calling, I'd prefer to keep the communication done through email for the purposes of documentation. I'd had things told to me over the phone by J- that he later changed/forgot and I'd like to keep the trail.

I'll give you a run down of the events (pardon the length!):

When I moved in, there were many issues that I'd reported on my move-in sheet, including damage to one of the miniblinds in the living room. I let a number of the smaller things go thinking "if this passed their move-out inspection, then I'll be fine if it is still in the same condition when I leave."

During the time I was living there, I noticed very dark dust or possibly mold in the air ducts stuck to the vents, especially in the master bedroom. Also while I lived there I had a large rug in the front room and it had a bad habit of shedding. I would occasionally gather the fibers and just stuff it under the rug and clean it later on.

A few weeks before I moved out the sprinkler in my office started to leak. I reported it to maintenance, they came out and checked it and had to call the sprinkler company. When I came home the day the sprinkler company had been there, there had been a hole cut in the dry wall around the sprinkler with chalk all over the ground and the chunk of drywall just sitting on the desk. The solution in the sprinkler was quite bad smelling and had soaked into the carpet and padding.

I moved out at the end of February and had scheduled the maid service to come late on the 29th. An employee called me around noon on the 29th and asked if they could tour the apartment early since there was a tenant scheduled to move in in only 4 days, rather than the usual 2 weeks. I agreed but added "The maid has not come yet." She told me it wouldn't be a problem.

When I got my deposit check, it had deductions that shouldn't have been there. I was charged for the damage to the dry wall, for the replacement of 3 of the miniblinds, for photographs of cat fur and the rug fuzz and for air duct cleaning.

When I asked him to explain the damage to the miniblinds, he fabricated answers. He first told me that one of the slats was missing from the blind because at first glance of the photo, it does look like that. But the slat was perpendicular to the camera and against a white background but you can clearly see that it covers the strings and casts a thin shadow. The rug fuzz (which would have been gone had the worker not come before the maid) was labeled as a "stain" and while there was no charge for the "stain," I was still charged for all of these photos of: cat fur, rug fuzz and damage to the miniblinds. My contention is that if the damage to the miniblind was already reported on my move-in sheet, I should not pay for the photo of the damage when I move out. Likewise, I should not be charged for pictures of fuzz/fur that would have not been there had the workers come after the maid came.

When I first was talking with J- on the phone he told me that he could offer an $80 settlement which I turned down because I didn't just want part of the erroneous charges back, I wanted them all. He then later said that since I was already getting money back that it would have to go to committee and he'd call me the next day. A week passed without hearing from him before I contacted him again, his claim is that he left a message on my machine... the number he gave was one digit off from my actual number.

I get a settlement offer in the mail for about $52 with no explanation of what was included, how the number was derived, or why it was lower than the offer over the phone that I'd already turned down. I emailed him some questions and they went unanswered. At that point I felt my only course of actually getting anything done and having the right amount refunded was to take Richdale to small claims court since I was being deliberately ignored by the staff. The settlement offer was dated, but due to J-'s refusal to respond to my questions, I wouldn't sign it. He never had even acknowledged that the damage was on the move in sheet.

I have not been able to cash the original check for about $142 since by endorsing it the stamp on the back states that I agree that I've been paid in full, which I don't. That check is good for only 90 days and was issued on March 12 so it will have expired before this is resolved.

My most recent unanswered request was for a fax of the receipt for the air duct cleaning. His claim was that it had to be done for pet odor, but by his own admission, that was localized to one spot in the living room where the padding had to be pulled. Originally I wasn't even contesting the air duct because I don't believe I have any photos of the mold/dust that had been coming out of the slats. The air ducts definitely needed to be cleaned, but they needed cleaning before I moved in and I don't feel that the normal wear-and-tear expense should have to be footed by me.

So, that leaves us where I would need the original amount (on the now-expired check) reissued with the addition of the rest of the erroneous charges. I'd much prefer not to have to go to court over something that should be pretty easy to resolve, and I'm very hopeful that now that it's out of J-'s hands, something may actually be done about it.

By the end, it became more about the principle of it all; there was clearly an error and he simply refused to address or resolve it. I felt I'd been a good tenant (reporting gushing water leakages on the main floor which, had it not been stopped early would've caused much more damage to people's property, reporting broken/fallen lights, reporting missing sprinkler heads causing geisers, closing hallway windows during rain storms, etc) and had been pretty happy with Breckenridge, all the way until I had to start dealing with J-.

Thanks, sorry about the length!
Paul


=================================================================================
K- T- to me 6/12/08

The check that you have can be cashed. When a final determination is made, and if additional refund is calculated a separate check along with a settlement agreement will be issued. I hope that having this is writing will make you feel more comfortable cashing the check. I am reviewing your notes below, as well as talking with the property and committee. I will have a response for you by June 20, 2008. I apologize for the delay. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me by telephone or E mail. I do respond to all inquiries. K- T-

=================================================================================
Paul to K- T- 6/12/08

K-,

Thanks for the quick response. After receiving some legal advice, I would prefer to receive a new check that did not have the stipulation of it being payment in full on the back (or I would sign a check with that statement if it were a new check that covered the deductions that had been taken out in error).

The check is a legal contract and by signing it, I would remove my ability to pursue the issue in court if that's where it ends up, and your statements in an email nullifying said contract may not hold up in court. I don't mean to be difficult, I just don't feel comfortable with my signature below that statement. I hope you understand.

Thanks,
Paul

=================================================================================
K- T- to me 6/12/08

That is fine. I will make a quick resolution to you questions. Again, I do apologize for the delay.

=================================================================================
Me to K- T- 6/26/08 (I gave her 2 weeks before replying)

Is there any response yet?

=================================================================================
K- T- to me 6/26/08

I apologize for the delay in responding. I have had numerous files to review and it is taking some time. I am waiting to get invoices from the property.
=================================================================================
Me to K- T- 8/1/08 (more than a month from her last email)

K-,

You promised I would have total resolution by 6 weeks ago. What is the hold up? Now it's been over a month since you said you were waiting on invoices. How long can it take to get the invoices?

I moved out at the end of February; I want my deposit back.

By the end of next week there will be resolution or I will be taking Richdale to court.

This is really getting to be utterly ridiculous,
Paul

=================================================================================
NO RESPONSE FROM RICHDALE!
Me to K- T- 8/28/08 (almost a full month since my last email, 2 months from her responding to me)


K-,

On the Richdale Group website, the address is listed as:

10040 Regency Circle, Suite 200
Omaha, NE 68114

Who should I put as the ATTN line for the Notice to Defendant?
Paul

PS You actually had me going, I really thought you were going to help me and that the problems I'd experienced with Richdale were unique to J- V-. Your refusal to answer my questions or resolve the issue when I've allowed you more than sufficient time indicates that the problem isn't unique to J- but is systemic. I was originally thinking (after I'd started talking with you) that my reviews for Breckenridge were going to have a happy ending where everything got resolved.

=================================================================================
Me to K- T- 8/28/08

On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 9:21 AM, K- T- wrote:
>> That is fine. I will make a quick resolution to you questions. Again, I do apologize for the delay.


Were you lying? That was written 2.5 months ago and still nothing is resolved. [Tragic event removed] so things got a little thrown off track for a while but unless you have a resolution to all this, I'll be taking you to court, once I file you will be required to produce the documents I've requested during the discovery period. In addition to the money that Richdale has already acknowledge was deducted IN ERROR, Richdale will also foot the bill for the filing fee. It's in Richdale's best interest to resolve this out of court.

I'll be calling you to confirm the address for where to send the Notice to Defendant. I'd originally thought that J- was just a bad employee, but seeing how you've chosen to ignore me for weeks and your refusal to actually resolve an issue that should be relatively simple, I can see that Richdale as a company, not just J-, has a policy to screw over tenants once they've left with no sense of doing the right thing. There needs to be public records of the rulings against your company so I can reference them when I file with the BBB and any review site I can find.

You had me going, I really thought you were going to resolve the issue. I was going to rewrite my negative reviews with the updated information showing how it was just the one bad apple. But you're worse than J-, he would at least respond to my emails (sure he didn't include the information I requested, but at least he didn't ignore me).

Paul
=================================================================================
** It's now January 2009 and I haven't heard a word. **
=================================================================================
Me to K- T- 1/30/09

I submitted my claim with the BBB today, if no resolution comes through that, then I'll file with the courts.

While Richdale's initial mistakes may have been accidental, your decision to ignore me is 100% deliberate.

How do you sleep a night knowing that you are stealing people's hard-earned money that Richdale has acknowledged it has no claim on?

Richdale charged me for stuff they admitted they shouldn't have, why is it so hard to just give the money back? I still have the work order for the sprinkler company, the photos of the fuzz I was charged for, the photos of mini-blinds that are on the faxed copy of my move-in sheet showing the damage already listed... Why would you think Richdale has a claim to that money when all the documents show otherwise? Why can't you just right the wrong?

Paul
=================================================================================


ANALYSIS:

So, some very important thing to notice is that K- :
1) Wanted me to sign the check.
2) Told me it would be ok and that having an email telling me so should make me feel better.

A check is a legal contract between two parties. Most people don't think of it like that because they're so common, but both people sign it and the signatures allow the transfer of money and bind you to any agreements stated on the check. The stamp is designed to prevent you from getting your money back. In law, this stamp accomplishes "Accord and Satisfaction". By signing it, you are releasing them from repaying the full amount and only have a limited time window to reverse it (and give the money back) once you realize what you did. If you do not do it within the specified time window, you have to then additionally prove "Affirmative Defense" which shifts the power to their side, and they know it!

My signature on that check would have significantly more weight in court than to show up with an email where she said I could sign it but not be bound by that term.

There are 2 explanations for why she did this:
1) She thought she was being nice and thought her email changing the terms of the contract would be sufficient.
2) She knew the signature on the check would hold up in court and dissuade any further action.

If she thought she was being nice, then she doesn't really know her job very well since I'm sure they've had other issues with the signature under the "Accord and Satisfaction" statement has gotten them out of issues. This would mean that their worker is incompetent.

Considering that as soon as I stated that I would *not* sign the check she discontinued any more correspondence with me, she exposed her plans. It was their last effort to seal up the matter and prevent me from pursuing it further in court while trying to look nice and pleasant. When I got some law advice and was instructed "IT'S A CONTRACT! DO NOT SIGN IT!" they had no more need to continue the charade and stopped responding.

They were attempting to manipulate me into waving my rights away based on a promise that would not hold up in court. These people are devious liars.

====[Update: 7/23/09]====
Getting the BBB involved was the best move and I wish I had done it much sooner! Getting them involved finally escalated the case within Richdale and even though they refused to email me me any more because I was posting the emails publicly by that point, they called and asked what I wanted back, which is when I sent this email, they sent some check indemnification forms which were ultimately not required since I had my original check (with all the bogus deductions) and sent it back to them and they sent me a replacement check with a break down of all the charges and refunds. I got notice from the BBB that Richdale considered the matter closed and gave me the option to respond if I disagreed. Then I waited a while after the check cleared before updating any of my reviews or blogs.

Intro

Hi, I'm a former tenant of Breckenridge Apartments in Omaha, NE. It's located on 160th & Center. The owning company, Richdale Group, is a deceitful, greedy company and I strongly advise against renting from any of their properties. This blog will detail how they have deliberately cheated me out of money which they have even acknowledged they owe me but refuse to pay.

They attempted to get me to endorse a check, the signing of it would have forfeited my right to the rest of the money they had erroneously taken out of my deposit. They acknowledge they were wrong to have deducted things but refuse to pay me anything and as soon as I declined to endorse that check, wanting a new check written for the full amount before I blindly trusted them to follow through, they said it would be no problem and they'd handle it within a week. They then immediately ceased all communication with me. This was many months ago and they continue to ignore my emails asking for status and resolution.

In Omaha, Richdale properties include:

1. ALPINE VILLAGE APARTMENTS
7100 South 86th Street, LaVista, NE 68128
2. BRECKENRIDGE APARTMENTS
15950 Wright Plaza, Omaha, NE 68130
3. BRISTOL SQUARE APARTMENTS
3110 North 97th Street, Omaha, NE 68134
4. EMBASSY PARK APARTMENTS
9045 Burt Street, Omaha, NE 68114
5. INWOOD VILLAGE APARTMENTS
8220 South 87th Street, LaVista, NE 68128
6. KENSINGTON WOODS APARTMENTS
1323 North 108th Street, Omaha, NE 68114
7. LATVIAN VILLAGE APARTMENTS
3002 Paddock Road, Omaha, NE 68124
8. LIONSHEAD APARTMENTS
1414 North 108th Street, Omaha, NE 68154
9. THE BILTMORE APARTMENTS
11525 Decatur Plaza, Omaha, NE 68154
10. THE INVERNESS APARTMENTS
8220 S 87th Street, LaVista, NE 68128
11. THE VANDERBILT APARTMENTS
11233 Decatur Plaza, Omaha, NE 68154

This blog contains relevant emails / phone summaries from their office showing a pattern of deceit and/or incompetence on their part with the ultimate goal to steal my money.

Look forward to my videos that I'll be posting to YouTube! The public needs to know about how this company treats their tenants!